Peer checking is a technique where two individuals work together to prevent errors before and during a specific action or task. Here are the key points about peer checking:
- It involves a performer (the person doing the task) and a peer checker (someone familiar with the task who observes the performer).
- The purpose is to prevent errors by the performer by having a second set of eyes verify the correct action is being taken.
- The performer and peer checker first agree on the intended action and component. Then, the performer performs the action while the peer observes to confirm it was done correctly.
- It augments self-checking by the performer but does not replace self-checking. Both individuals self-check in parallel.
- The peer checker provides a fresh perspective that is not trapped in the performer’s task mindset, allowing them to potentially identify hazards or consequences the performer may miss.
- It is recommended for critical, irreversible steps or error-likely situations where an extra verification can prevent mistakes.
- Peer checking should be used judiciously and not mandated for all actions, as overuse can make it become a mechanical process that loses effectiveness.
- It can also be used to evaluate potential fatigue or stress in a co-worker before starting a task.
Personally, I think we overcheck, and the whole process loses effectiveness. A big part of automation and computerized systems like an MES is removing the need for peer checking. But frankly, I’m pretty sure it will never go away.


One thought on “Peer Checking”