I think every quality professional should, somewhere between individual contributor and manager, have to do a deep study into philosophy.

Studying philosophy offers several important benefits for the modern professional, enhancing both personal development and professional capabilities. Here are some reasons why philosophy is valuable in today’s professional quality leader:

1. Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving: Philosophy teaches individuals to think clearly, carefully, and logically about a wide range of topics. This skill is crucial for analyzing complex problems, making informed decisions, and developing innovative solutions in any professional field.
2. Communication Skills: Engaging with philosophical texts and discussions enhances one’s ability to read closely, write clearly, and articulate thoughts effectively. These communication skills are essential for conveying ideas persuasively and collaborating with others in a professional setting.
3. Ethical Reasoning: Philosophy provides a framework for addressing ethical questions and dilemmas. Understanding ethical principles helps professionals navigate moral challenges and make decisions that align with their values and societal norms. Ethical reasoning provides a framework for making decisions that are fair and just to all parties involved, ensuring that the organization’s actions align with its values and ethical standards
4. Cultural Awareness and Adaptability: Studying philosophy fosters cultural awareness and sensitivity, enabling professionals to work effectively in diverse environments. This awareness is particularly valuable in globalized industries where understanding different perspectives and cultural contexts is crucial.
5. Leadership and Strategic Thinking: Philosophy encourages big-picture thinking and strategic planning. Leaders who study philosophy are better equipped to anticipate future challenges, understand complex systems, and inspire others with a vision that goes beyond immediate concerns.
6. Career Versatility: Philosophy graduates pursue careers in various fields, including technology, business, law, government, and journalism. The skills acquired through studying philosophy are transferable and valued across multiple industries, providing a strong foundation for diverse career paths.

I’m certainly not an expert, but I do believe my professional life has benefited from philosophical study. I tend to be drawn to deontological ethics, a branch of moral philosophy that emphasizes the importance of rules, duties, and obligations in determining the morality of actions, rather than focusing on the consequences of those actions.

I can apply deontological ethics to the philosophy of quality management, particularly in the work of one of my favorite thinkers, W. Edwards Deming, which resonates with the principles of duty, rules, and respect for individuals. Here are some of the integrations I draw from:

1. Duty and Moral Rules: Deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to moral rules and duties. In quality management, this can translate to a commitment to ethical standards and practices that prioritize quality and integrity over short-term gains. Deming’s emphasis on building quality into the product from the start (rather than relying on inspection) aligns with a deontological focus on doing what is right as a matter of principle.
2. Respect for Individuals: Deontological ethics stresses the importance of treating individuals with respect and dignity. Deming’s philosophy includes driving out fear and fostering an environment where employees can take pride in their work without fear of retribution. This reflects a deontological commitment to respecting the autonomy and rights of workers. Bocheński’s distinction between the nature of authority based on knowledge (epistemic) and authority based on power or obligation (deontic) is a fundamental read for understanding quality culture. 
3. Leadership and Responsibility: Deming’s points on leadership—such as instituting leadership that helps people and systems perform better—can be seen through a deontological lens as a duty to lead ethically and responsibly. This involves creating systems that support ethical behavior and quality improvement as a core value.
4. Systemic Integrity: Deming’s approach to quality management, which includes breaking down barriers between departments and fostering collaboration, can be aligned with deontological ethics by emphasizing the duty to maintain systemic integrity and fairness. This involves ensuring that all parts of an organization work together ethically to achieve common goals.
5. Commitment to Continuous Improvement: While utilitarian approaches might focus on outcomes, a deontological perspective in quality management would emphasize the duty to continuously improve processes and systems as a moral obligation, regardless of immediate outcomes. This aligns with Deming’s focus on constant improvement and education.

By integrating deontological ethics into quality management, I feel we can create a framework that not only seeks to improve quality and efficiency but also adheres to ethical principles that respect and empower individuals within the system.

A Reading List

• The Right and the Good by W.D. Ross: This classic work introduces Ross’s theory of prima facie duties, which is central to his deontological framework.
• The View from Nowhere by Thomas Nagel: This book explores the tension between subjective and objective perspectives, which is relevant to understanding ethical duties and objectivity in decision-making.
• On Human Nature by Roger Scruton: Scruton discusses human nature and ethics, providing insights into moral duties and the philosophical underpinnings of ethical behavior.
• Intention by G.E.M. Anscombe: This influential work examines the philosophy of action and intention, contributing to discussions on moral responsibility and ethics.
• Postures of the Mind by Annette Baier: Baier’s essays explore trust, ethics, and the moral psychology underlying ethical relationships.
• What is Authority? by Józef Maria Bocheński: This book delves into the concept of authority, distinguishing between deontic and epistemic authority and is hugely influential.