
Ah, the New Year. A time of trying to remember how to write the correct date and mostly failing. A time where I practice my capability to make simple corrections on forms still completed by hand.

Ah, the New Year. A time of trying to remember how to write the correct date and mostly failing. A time where I practice my capability to make simple corrections on forms still completed by hand.
How widespread is adoption of ISO 8601, the standard for date and time formats? Is your company aligned?
I see ISO 8601 widely used in scientific fields, software development, and more and more international correspondence. Yet, I think its fair to say the adoption in pharma has been lacking. So I am really curious, has your organization fully or partially adopted it? If so, how did it go?
The basic principle of ISO 8601 for dates is to represent them in a descending order of significance:
ISO 8601 defines the following time format:
Where:
Example: T134730 or T13:47:30 represents 1:47:30 PM
ISO 8601 allows combining date and time representations:
Example: 2022-09-26T07:58:30 represents September 26, 2022, at 7:58:30 AM
The standard also specifies how to represent time zones:
Example: 2022-09-07T15:50+00:00 or 2022-09-07T15:50Z represents 3:50 PM UTC on September 7, 2022.
Many countries have officially adopted ISO 8601 as their recommended or mandated date format for government and official use. For example:
The European Union has adopted ISO 8601 as the European Standard EN 28601, making it valid in all EU countries.
Has anyone seen Health Canada or an EMA (and/or national competent authority) push back at a time/date not in ISO 8061 format? I think there has been a lot of push back in health care around adoption, for example the NHS in the UK uses 01-JAN-2017 for medicine labels even though the UK has adopted ISO 8061.
I find it fascinating that the eCTD specification does not mandate a specific date format for metadata or content within submissions, allowing flexibility for regional requirements. Yet we have seen many health authorities that have implemented eCTD do recommend or require the use of ISO 8601 date formats in certain contexts:
The eCTD XML backbone uses the W3C XML Schema date and dateTime datatypes, which are based on ISO 8601 formats. While not explicitly requiring ISO 8601, the eCTD specification does emphasize the importance of consistent and unambiguous date representations, which aligns with the goals of ISO 8601. It really makes me wonder when this decision will start rippling through other parts of the industry.
I’d love your thoughts.