Simple mistakes can distract from your message.
— Read on hbr.org/2018/10/9-words-and-phrases-youre-probably-using-wrong
A very good list for all of us to read and adopt.
Simple mistakes can distract from your message.
— Read on hbr.org/2018/10/9-words-and-phrases-youre-probably-using-wrong
A very good list for all of us to read and adopt.
Recently I’ve seen a few inspection observations that have provided an observation on the title of quality record (e.g. deviation, CAPA, change control).
The title might seem the most basic part of a quality system record – a simple task – but instead it should receive some serious thought. This is any inspector’s first interaction, it serves as a historical flag that generations of readers will use to become familiar. And everyone falls prey to “judging a book by its cover.” This cognitive bias tends to make readers considerably susceptible to allowing the quality systems title to function as the sole factor influencing their decision of whether to read or skip a record. A bad title could shape an inspection or deprive an important historical record from being evaluated in the future. We can do better.
A good quality systems record title:
Some general tips:
Avoid: Wrong label issued
Better: Sample ABCD was issued label 1234 instead of label X4572
Avoid: No LIMS label for batch ABDC
Better: Batch ABDC was missing label Y457 as required by procedure LAB-123
It sometimes surprises folks how simple things can have ripple effects. But they do, so plan accordingly and ensure your users are trained on writing a good title. Trust me; it will make things easier in the long run.