Acountable People

We tend to jumble forms of accountability in an organization, often confusing between a people manager and a technical manager. I think its very important to differentiate between the two.

People managers deal with human resources and team dynamics, while technical managers deal with managing design, execution, and improvement. They can be the same person, but we need to recognize the differences and resource appropriately. Too often we blur the two roles and as a result neither is done well.

I’ve talked on this blog about a few of the technical manager types: Process Owners, the ASTM E2500 SME/Molecule Steward, and Knowledge Owners. There are certainly others out there. In the table below I added two more for comparison:

  • a qualified person from OSHA, because I think this is a great generic look at the concept
  • The EU Qualifed Person. Industry relevant and one that often gets confused in execution.
AspectQualified Person (OSHA Definition)Qualified Person (EU)Knowledge OwnerASTM E2500 SMEProcess Owner
Primary FocusEnsuring compliance with safety standards and solving technical problemsCertifying that each batch of a medicinal product meets all required provisionsManaging and maintaining knowledge within a specific domainEnsuring manufacturing systems meet quality and safety standardsManaging and optimizing a specific business process
Key ResponsibilitiesSolve or resolve problems related to the subject matter, work, or projectCertify batches meet GMP and regulatory standardsMaintain and update knowledge baseDefine system needs and identify critical aspectsDefine process goals, purpose, and KPIs
Design and install systems to improve safetyEnsure compliance with market authorization requirementsValidate and broadcast new knowledgeDevelop and execute verification strategiesCommunicate with key players and stakeholders
Ensure compliance with laws and standardsOversee quality control and assurance processesProvide training and supportReview system designs and manage risksAnalyze process performance and identify improvements
May not have the authority to stop workConduct audits and inspectionsMonitor and update knowledge assetsLead quality risk management effortsEnsure process compliance with regulations and standards
Skills RequiredTechnical expertise in the areaDegree in pharmacy, biology, chemistry, or related fieldSubject matter expertise in specific knowledge domainTechnical understanding of manufacturing systems and equipmentLeadership and communication skills
Certification, degree, or other professional recognitionSeveral years of experience in pharmaceutical manufacturingAnalytical and validation skillsRisk management and verification skillsAnalytical and problem-solving skills
Ability to solve technical problemsRegistered with the competent authority in the EU member stateTraining and support skillsContinuous improvement and change management skillsAbility to define and monitor KPIs
AuthorityAuthority to design and install safety systemsAuthority to certify batches and ensure complianceAuthority over knowledge management processes and contentAuthority to define and verify critical aspects of systemsAuthority to make decisions and implement changes in the process
Interaction with OthersCollaborates with production and quality control teamsWorks with quality control, assurance, and regulatory teamsWorks with various departments to ensure knowledge is shared and utilizedCollaborates with project stakeholders and engineering teamsCommunicates with project leaders, process users, and other stakeholders
Examples of ActivitiesReviewing batch documentation and certifying productsCertifying each batch of medicinal products before releaseValidating new knowledge submissionsConducting quality risk analyses and verification testsDefining process objectives and mission statements
Ensuring compliance with GMP and regulatory standardsEnsuring compliance with GMP and regulatory standardsProviding training on knowledge management systemsReviewing system designs and managing changesMonitoring process performance and compliance
Overseeing investigations related to quality issuesOverseeing quality control and assurance processesUpdating and maintaining knowledge databasesLeading continuous improvement effortsIdentifying and implementing process improvements
Industry ContextPrimarily in construction, manufacturing, and safety-critical industriesPharmaceutical and biotechnology industries within the EUApplicable across various industries, especially information-heavy sectorsPrimarily in pharmaceutical and biotechnology industriesApplicable in any industry with defined business processes
Comparison table
  • Qualified Person (OSHA Definition): Focuses on ensuring compliance with safety standards and solving technical problems. They possess technical expertise and professional recognition and are responsible for designing and installing safety systems.
  • Qualified Person (EU): Ensures that each batch of medicinal products meets all required provisions before release. They are responsible for compliance with GMP and regulatory standards and must be registered with the competent authority in the EU member state.
  • Knowledge Owner: Manages and disseminates knowledge within an organization. They ensure that knowledge is accurate, up-to-date, and accessible, and they provide training and support to facilitate knowledge sharing.
  • ASTM E2500 SME: Ensures that manufacturing systems meet quality and safety standards. They define system needs, develop verification strategies, manage risks, and lead continuous improvement efforts.
  • Process Owner: Manages and optimizes specific business processes. They define process goals, monitor performance, ensure compliance with standards, and implement improvements to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.

Common Themes

Subject Matter Expertise

  • All roles require a high level of subject matter expertise in their respective domains, whether it’s technical knowledge, regulatory compliance, manufacturing processes, or business processes.
  • This expertise is typically gained through formal education, certifications, extensive training, and practical experience.

Ensuring Compliance and Quality

  • A key responsibility across these roles is ensuring compliance with relevant laws, regulations, standards, and quality requirements.

Risk Identification and Management

  • These roles are all responsible for identifying potential risks, hazards, or process inefficiencies.
  • They are expected to develop and implement strategies to mitigate or eliminate these risks, ensuring the safety of operations and the quality of products or processes.

Continuous Improvement and Change Management

  • They are involved in continuous improvement efforts, identifying areas for optimization and implementing changes to enhance efficiency, quality, and knowledge sharing.
  • They are responsible for managing change processes, ensuring smooth transitions, and minimizing disruptions.

Authority and Decision-Making

  • Most of these roles have a certain level of authority and decision-making power within their respective domains.

Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing

  • Effective collaboration and knowledge sharing are essential for these roles to succeed.

While these roles have distinct responsibilities and focus areas, they share common goals of ensuring compliance, managing risks, driving continuous improvement, and leveraging subject matter expertise to achieve organizational objectives and maintain high standards of quality and safety. They are more similar than dissimilar and should be looked at holistically within the organization.

Indirect Accountability

The kind of accountability most of us are familiar with is direct accountability: a role is assigned a task and is directly accountable for their result. The role understands the quality, quantity, timeframe, and resource constraints of the deliverable and has the authority to implement plans to achieve it. When completing a RACI this is what we mean by accountability.

Ideally, the individual with direct accountability has the context to understand the limits in which they must work and sufficient knowledge about all of the factors that must be considered to make good decisions. However, that’s not always the case, and for this reason, organizations need to establish lateral roles of indirect accountability to ensure these factors are brought to the attention of the role with direct accountability.

Indirect roles are responsible for initiating action toward directly accountable roles. Indirect roles may be responsible for:

  • Informing: being aware of the factors surrounding the direct and initiating contact to offer advice and recommendations.
  • Persuading: persuading the direct to adjust their actions when there is a risk of undermining process control or when multiple roles fail to work together effectively.
  • Instructing: ordering the direct to stop when working outside of limits and/or take prescribed action to mitigate a catastrophic event.
  • Responding: Provide the direct service and support

Often these indirects are accountable in a supporting process.