The yearly database of 483s has been updated by the FDA. Lots will be written on themes as we end the year, so I decided to give a few of my immediate observations.
I find that over time what I focus in on changes, as my jobs evolve and change, and the interests I have shift. However, some things never change, so let us talk change.
Reference Number | Short Description | Long Description | 2020 Frequency | 2019 Frequency | 2018 Frequency |
21 CFR 211.100(a) | Changes to Procedures Not Reviewed, Approved | Changes to written procedures are not [drafted, reviewed and approved by the appropriate organizational unit] [reviewed and approved by the quality control unit]. Specifically, *** | 8 | 13 | 9 |
21 CFR 211.160(a) | Lab controls established, including changes | The establishment of [specifications] [standards] [sampling plans] [test procedures] [laboratory control mechanisms] including any changes thereto, are not [drafted by the appropriate organizational unit] [reviewed and approved by the quality control unit]. Specifically, *** | 4 | 18 | 17 |
21 CFR 212.20(c) | Adverse effects of changes made | You did not demonstrate that any change does not adversely affect the [identity] [strength] [quality] [purity] of your PET drug. Specifically,*** | 1 | 1 | 1 |
I think its fair to say the decreases as a result of the pandemic and the reduced inspections.
Over on the device side of things we see:
Reference Number | Short Description | Long Description | Frequency |
21 CFR 820.30(i) | Design changes – Lack of or Inadequate Procedures | Procedures for design change have not been [adequately] established. Specifically,*** | 26 |
21 CFR 820.40(b) | Document change records, maintained. | Records of changes to documents were not [adequately] maintained. Specifically, *** | 6 |
21 CFR 820.70(b) | Production and Process Change Procedures, lack of or Inad. | Procedures for changes to a [specification] [method] [process] [procedure] have not been [adequately] established. Specifically, *** | 5 |
21 CFR 820.75(c) | Process changes – review, evaluation and revalidation | A validated process was not [reviewed and evaluated] [revalidated] when changes or process deviations occurred. Specifically, *** | 5 |
21 CFR 820.40(b) | Change records, content | Records of changes did not include [a description of the change] [identification of the affected documents] [the signature of the approving official(s)] [the approval date] [when the change became effective]. Specifically, *** | 3 |
21 CFR 820.50(b) | Supplier notification of changes | There is no agreement with [suppliers] [contractors] [consultants] to notify you of changes in the product or service. Specifically, *** | 3 |
21 CFR 820.75(c) | Documentation – review in response to changes or deviations | There is no documentation of the [review and evaluation of a process] [revalidation of a process] performed in response to changes or process deviations. Specifically, *** | 1 |
I’m a firm believer that pharma should always pay attention to the medical device side for 483s. A lot of us are combination products now (or will be) and there is always good trends to be aware of.
My key takeaways:
- Think change management and not just change control and document control
- Computer change controls need to be holistic and system orientated
- Have a process that ensures changes are appropriately reviewed and approved
- Risk based and evaluate validation
- A robust supplier management program is critical, plan for change
Here’s a more detailed checklist to help you evaluate your change system.
2 thoughts on “2020 FDA 483s around change”